Say It Ain't So, Mitch

Posted Wednesday, October 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    And that, my friends, just about says it all.

    -- Posted by Leo L. Southworth on Thu, Oct 28, 2010, at 3:59 AM
  • True...but it just depends who is running against him. Many elections are decided by voting for the "lesser of two evils". I still believe that McCain would have won if he had not chosen Sarah Palin for a running mate. She was just TOO right of center for many steadfast Republicans to imagine her running things had something happened to McCain during his presidency.

    Up until that point it was Obama vs McCain...Afterwards it was anyone but Palin. As I said not for all but that is when the shift happened. Notice that even some Republicans have distanced themselves from her now...she is a loose cannon like Jesse Jackson...Speaks for movements and emotions but doesn't really do anything constructive, just causing more division among people and making it impossible for some groups to even try to work together.

    -- Posted by Jenny Moore on Thu, Oct 28, 2010, at 7:19 AM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: