Imply: A writer or speaker implies something, meaning that it is indicated or suggested without being explicitly stated. (Translegal.com)
At the close of Election Day 1976, we Goldwater conservatives stood in front of the Court House in Warrenton, Mo., and wondered who in the world was Jimmy Carter and where had he come from? The opinion put forth which seemed most likely was that Carter had asked God if He would please make old Jimmy the 39th President of the United States. God had looked around for somebody better, shrugged His majestic shoulders and said, "why not?"
As this is being written there are only two weeks left of what has seemed ceaseless electioneering. When the appointed hour arrives there will be those of us who will choose to exercise our right of suffrage (or not to so exercise) based solely on firmly and honestly held beliefs that one Party or the other accurately reflects how "the Bible says" a Christian "must" vote.
It is the opinion of this writer that those who puts themselves forward as being a Christian have taken up an obligation to separate what the New Testament clearly implies from what is merely their own inferred opinion. Sometimes the difference is a fine line, one often unwittingly crossed.
Following are a few observations about what the New Testament does not and does imply about elections. How a Christian decides for whom one will vote being a separate subject altogether.
New Testament times were much different (ruled unilaterally by Caesars and all), but it is not readily apparent the Christian is scripturally obligated to vote at all. In the five translations I have Scripture does not specifically say "be in the world but not of it." But the idea is implied if you wish to research it. Part of being in the world, and a citizen of it, is generally assumed to be voting. Now I'm all for everyone voting; just not sure the text implies I would not be a Christian if I pass on a given ballot or part thereof. If, indeed, as a citizen I ought to vote, there does not seem to be any requirement to vote either for/against any Party line, or for/against things about which I remain ignorant.
The one, perhaps only, fundamental duty Scripture seems to clearly imply is an obligation to support whoever wins. You or I may not like, even despise or fear, the philosophies embraced by any person elected to authority; but the Christian's calling is to:
"Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God." (Romans 13.1, NIV)
And, once God finds His Jimmy Carter, we are called upon to speak no hurt against that man or woman:
"I urge, then, first of all, that petitions, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for all people -- for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness" (I Timothy 2.1-2, NIV). Also see Titus 3.1-2 and I Peter 2.13-17.
The Church of this generation can be criticized for many things. One of the lesser of these things may well be disrespect spewed out against those "in authority" by persons holding themselves forth as Christian gentlemen and woman.
This writer has read and studied the Bible has it has come down to us for a while now; and, back in the Dark Ages even earned a B.S. in Biblical Studies. Please advise if holy writ implies any higher political obligation than supporting of those "in authority" -- whatever we think of them.