|
|
Overcast ~ High: 37°F ~ Low: 28°F Thursday, Feb. 9, 2012 |
|
Where is America Going?Posted Thursday, July 31, 2008, at 6:31 AM
In March 2006, Indiana became one of the few states to put into statute that an individual does not have a duty to retreat from an attacker before using deadly force to prevent injury to one's self. At the same time, Indiana passed a law establishing a life-time firearms carrying permit, eliminating much of the hassle of carrying a firearm while maintaining a program of scrutiny as to who is legally carrying a weapon. Recently, the United States Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that (fire) arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home for the first time in history. The Supreme Court also held that "Similarly, the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional." Where is America going when good sense appears to be coming back into use?
The courts have long held the opinion that the police have no "duty to protect" the individual. The Law Enforcement role is one of keeping the peace, crime prevention by presence, and seeking out those who commit crimes for judgment under the judicial system. It is also a lot easier to have a firearm handy if you should need it than it is to have your very own detail of police officers for your protection. This does not mean that I advocate that everyone buy a gun and keep it in your home. If you do not know how to use one, you should learn before you buy one. Guns are, inherently, a dangerous piece of equipment. You have to evaluate your own situation and your own personal inclination. I have lived around firearms all of my life. I had a close relative commit suicide with a rifle and I am the only male on my father's side of the family due to a accident with a firearm in my uncle's home. These incidents were not the fault of the tool used; they were caused by people through action or error. I am just glad that the Supreme Court decided to make their opinion known and that they re-affirmed that we have the right to protect ourselves with the best means available. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Hot topics Every Day's a Holiday - Data, Scope, and Perspective(0 ~ 7:15 AM, Sep 22)
On People, Permanence, and the Almost Perpetual Nature of a School Corporation
'PORK' and the Fallacy of Community Schools in Indiana in 2010
Professionals, Experts, the Common Man and Government Decisions
Musical Chairs, What a Game!
|
I agree with your article with the exception of the Supremm Court ruling. Self defence has always been a right, a God given right, that preexisted the Constitution. As for the cause of common sense coming back, it is not hard to explane. The liberal ideas are so lame that the general public are starting to see thru their little game for power.
Self defense is a God given right? really!
LOL.................... yes, self defense is a God given right, even an instinct that we are born with. Our bodies come with a built-in "flight or flight" mode.
The ruling of the Supreme Court and the passing of Indiana had nothing to do with what God gave us; they just clarified it within the law.
Even mice have claws and teeth that they will us in self-defense if cornered.
Self-defense and personal security are the responsibility of the individual, not the government. Govenrment should not impede the public or the individual in being able to take action to fulfill that responsibility by taking away the tools needed.
I agree with FlyinLion and Mr. Southworth.
In most states there are specific laws relating to defense of home and self. They are commonly referred to as "Castle Laws" emphasizing that your home is your "castle" and that under the law you have a right to protect the people and contents of it. While some states are more restrictive as to it's application and boundaries they still exsist as a means to protect the individuals rights.
If you look back recently a couple months you will see that this has been upheld in court, most notably in Texas where a man defended not only his property but that of his neighbor and was acquitted of any charges of wrong doing.
This is just one of many examples of when people follow the rules, the system actually works. It's not perfect by any means but it's a lot better than some of the countries I have traveled to.