|
Brazil, Indiana ~ Tuesday, January 6, 2009
| Blogs | ![]() |
|
Lack of a teacher contract?
Posted Wednesday, July 2, 2008, at 7:46 AM<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>
Stay connected…Reported "lack" of teacher contract. Choices we've made in the past and how it has put us where we are today.
How long was it? Two years? Four? More? For how many months was it reported that the teachers were working without a contract? Does it really matter? How does this type of situation really affect the students and the quality of teaching over both the short and long term? I hope to answer a few of these questions, but more importantly I hope that my answers will bother the reader enough that they will become advocates for the students in our community and stop thinking that the situation is another's job and that they are not the one to take part, no matter what their opinion. Every day we let this continue it hurts our students. As in my previous article, we found that when our students are hurt, the entire community is being damaged irreparably. Fact of Fiction? The teachers were working without a contract. Fiction: The way the state of Indiana has written the law, a teacher's contract remains in place until a new contract is agreed upon. Fact or Fiction? The teachers have had the same benefits for the entire duration of their previous contract. Fiction: The way their health care benefit was written into the contract is not a dollar benefit but as a percentage of the total premium cost. Fact or Fiction? The teachers, administration, and non teaching staff all are treated equally as far as their health care benefits? Fiction: For the most part, the lower paid corporation staff get the least percentage of their premiums paid for. In some instances having to pay the corporation at the end of the month for family coverage. Any of us who have had healthcare benefits through their employer for the past several years, knows that healthcare insurance is spiraling out of control. I'll wager that at any place in the country premiums have risen each year, co pays and deductibles have gone up, and in some cases, benefits have gone down. Each one of us has had a larger chunk taken out of our take home pay due to this. The teacher's contract however stated that they only pay 10% of their health care insurance premiums, NO MATTER WHAT THE COST! So if they go up $50 a month, the teachers pay an extra $5 and our taxes pay $45! So in reality they would have actually been getting an additional $40 added to their salary while every one else has had a real sizable chunk taken out of theirs. Now these numbers aren't accurate. I'm only using easy to figure numbers to explain the way it is done. Now back to contract talks… Would you want to settle on a new contract knowing that you've been automatically getting more and more each year without negotiating anything? No. I certainly wouldn't want to. Who should we blame for this predicament teacher's union or the corporation? I don't think that we can blame anyone who was involved with negotiations, on either side. We certainly would be wasting our energy blaming those who set up the contract this way years ago as it was a different world when health care wasn't nearly as complicated or expensive. What we all need to ask ourselves is again involved with the subject of change, social responsibility, and the need to realize that this race for education and jobs is not with others in Clay County, but with the entire world. The teachers didn't want to give up their traditional benefit. The corporation couldn't afford to provide it and will soon be bankrupt which means that the state will come in and take over our schools. But it was settled and unlike the majority of the school corporations in the state, our staffing costs are up over 90% of the budget. On top of that our per student cost is WAY below that of other corporations [by about $2,000 per student] so we are providing even less in curriculum dollars per student by far. I am ashamed of this as all others should be as well. What do we do now? Go to our state representatives to get the outdated teacher's contract law repealed so the corporation can rework our outdated system. Get all the members of the team from administrators down to building staff and bus drivers on the same health care benefits as all are valuable members of the team. I have heard teachers argue that they went to school more so deserve better benefits. This is the wrong approach in my opinion. All members of the team deserve the best healthcare that the corporation can afford to provide. Differences in salary determine the educational criteria for different positions in the corporation. We also need to provide to all the corporation staff the dollar amount it costs the corporation to employ them. I'm sure this would have helped to get the contract settled in a lot more timely manner. The average employee did not see in their pay check stub what the corporation paid each pay period towards their health insurance so they did not see where the corporation paid more and more each year even without a contract renewal even though they might have actually been taking home a few dollars less than the year before. This caused a lot of unnecessary frustration on both sides. I've been promised by the corporation that this pay check stub change was going to be made this year. Hopefully it has. If it hasn't, I hope other readers too will inquire as to why it has not. Let's work on these issues now so by the time the next contract talks roll around some of these problems will have been solved and we can spend more time on the students. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Hot topics Stereotypes: Mentors and Misconceptions(1 ~ 10:00 AM, Jan 2)
Who is John Galt?
Pandora's Box?
Just what exactly does Pro life mean?
Observations
Mailing list
Enter your email address to join our daily headline mailing list:
|
WOW! This is quite an article. I am guessing that your teacher friends find this a bit offensive!
"We certainly would be wasting our energy blaming those who set up the contract this way years ago as it was a different world when health care wasn't nearly as complicated or expensive."
Yes, Jenny, it was a different world in more ways than just health care complications and expense. It was a world where teachers' pay was well below $6,950 per year (my first starting salary). The price of gasoline and all other necessities was lower....blah, blah, blah. So, it makes sense to leave teachers status quo, right?
"Now back to contract talks… Would you want to settle on a new contract knowing that you've been automatically getting more and more each year without negotiating anything?"
I know from my own personal experience that I take home less pay now than I did four years ago yet more is expected from me now than ever. I have no problem with accountability, but I do feel more work should equal more pay/benefits.
This article will most likely stimulate healthy conversation among any teacher friends you might have. I seriously doubt any of them will agree with you, however, especially with this statement: "The teachers didn't want to give up their traditional benefit. The corporation couldn't afford to provide it and will soon be bankrupt which means that the state will come in and take over our schools." I don't think the teachers' insurance plan will be the reason the school corporation will be bankrupt and taken over by the state. If that happens, I'm sure it will be due to a multitude of factors.
Bigpappy
Couldn't agree with you more! ;*)
One figure that is hard to be pinned down due to the traditional method of comparison of compensation is the total value of compensation for a position. By that, I mean salary plus the value of all benefits associated with employment. In the 1980's as a Sergeant of Marines, I drew something like $19,500 a year in salary, $3600 in housing allowance, $2400 in subsistance allowance, 30 days paid leave per year, unlimited paid sick days, and free medical and dental. Now, these figures are not actual, just close guesses used to illustrate a point. Adding the dollar amounts, you get a figure of $25,500, $5000 of which was not taxed. However, the value of the total compensation would be somewhere over $35,000, probably closer to $40,000 even in those days.
This is the kind of detail that one should consider when you are looking for a job or negotiating a contract. Benefits have a value that can be expressed in dollars.
Now, I'm not sure of the date, but I do believe that the teacher's contract that was signed last year has already ended. Most of that contract was in arrears.
Jenny is right, we do need to think on this.
The contract signed with the teachers is due to expire on July 31st. And, yes....most of that contract was simply to address the five years the teachers worked without a current contract and were status quo.
madmom......See, there ARE things we agree on! As I said earlier, we agree on most things.
Thanks for the info, Bigpappy.
Mrs. Moore- how about a blog on the spiraling cost of health care in this country. I imagine you can find away to blame that on the fine teachers of this community also. Health care costs are a disgrace felt by everybody and a much more worthy topic to protest and debate then trashing our fine educators. You hit a topic I could agree with you.
I met a second year teacher at Northview that brought 2 checks home a month. One was for $900 and the second one was for $325 after he paid for his insurance plan. Do you think he made any sacrifice because of health care or that we as taxpayers were taken by him.
Your slant and bias is too obvious. I too agree everyone should be on the same insurance but I will not blame the teachers and definately would dispute that they have gained considering my equation above.
Become more balnced and objective and leave the muckraking to talk radio. Have a good day.