|
|
Fair ~ High: 71°F ~ Low: 48°F |
|
Stay connected. Updating our education plan: Another snafu in the contract
Posted Thursday, July 17, 2008, at 8:04 AM<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>
This is the fourth article in a series concerning the health of the community and obstacles we must over come in today's changing environment as it applies to us personally in Clay County.
Just what today's student wants to hear. MORE SCHOOL. Yep, change is affecting our students most of all. We adults may have to learn to talk to computers when we call our insurance company or department store but the changes in our world have affected our student population the most. If they don't get the encouragement from us to embrace the changes, they will truly be left behind the pack who are part of tomorrow's society. In the past 10-20 years the importance of investing more time to educate today's student has really come to the surface. From head start preschool programs, all day Kindergarten, more classes per day in high school, all the way to more people going for degrees beyond the bachelor's. Benefits to kids who have had all day kindergarten show up right away in first grade. They are more prepared to advance at a faster pace in order to keep up with the rigorous level of education they will need at higher levels. Kids who don't have the benefit of all day Kindergarten are already behind their competitors for future jobs by the time they are in first grade! That makes the rest of their educational career a game of catch up! What happens when their entire school corporation is also operating under organization that is outdated? Unfortunately we know the answer to this as it is right here in our high school….The performance of Northview and its students is getting farther and farther behind the rest of the state year after year!!! The question is why does the school board and corporation administration continue to let this happen when they know about it? Remember that teacher contract? Remember how outdated the health insurance portion is? Remember that it will remain in effect until another contract is agreed upon? Not only was that contract set up without thought to the future economy and health care costs, it wasn't set up with current educational changes in mind. While other counties in the state have been able to add on an extra period of instruction at the high school level, we have not. The corporation knew that this was necessary years ago and put in place the "early bird" class as a TEMPORARY stop gap measure until the contract could be negotiated to add either extra teachers or extra teaching periods to the day. Does Early bird really work? In my opinion, no. Sure it works sometimes for the wealthier kids at the higher socioeconomic level of our community but is it really available to the others who may really need that opportunity the most? A bigger NO. To attend early bird classes, the student must have transportation to school. Either a parent, car, or friend, who can drive them to school so he can be sitting in the class room ready to learn at 7:30 AM. So those with moms at home or with parents with positions that allow them to arrive at work by 8AM or later, or have the ability to own and operate an extra vehicle can do this. Then there is the younger sibling issue. What about those who cannot leave the house until the bus comes as it would leave little brother or sister home alone? Is this socially responsible, fair, or even legal? Each one of us must search inside themselves in order to answer this question. Should the teachers be asked to give up more time to add on an extra teaching period in order to more fairly and completely educate our students? Yes, but I say this as it would be irresponsible for the corporation not to ask. What is a harder question to answer is can the teachers be expected to agree to it when it is not able to provide more compensation than the increased health care costs that are hidden in the existing contract. In the meantime, I urge you to go to your children who are going to be attending high school in the fall and insist that they take early bird classes. It is imperative to do this so that they will be in the running with the competition for better paying jobs. They are letting opportunities pass them by if they are going to study hall and not taking 7 classes. Whether they are college bound [and ALL should be thinking about this goal as theirs now a days] or not. We have paid for their schooling in our land taxes or rent checks. We are throwing away what we've already spent as well as throwing a portion of our childrens' futures away if we don't take full advantage of what's being offered. I don't care of they tell you they hate school. They don't have to like it: it's their job. It will give them more choices in the future that they aren't even aware of now. If you think that early bird is out of the question due to lack of transportation, ask your neighbor for help. This community is a strong one. If you think your neighbor needs help with this, offer it. If you can't find a solution, call the school and tell them that you can't get your son/daughter there. Maybe there's a teacher or another student going your way in the morning. Teachers aren't the enemy here. I've found that most are willing to go the extra mile so long as they're appreciated. It all goes back to investing in our community. There is no way to predict how the next contract is going to play out over this situation but what we can't do is sit around and wait for something to happen. It's a cop out to sit back and complain about the teachers union or the school board. Each has a legitimate position. If you continue to do nothing by your actions you are saying that you don't care. Nothing will happen unless you do your part! You aren't powerless unless you permit yourself to be! Only many people working together can make change. You may feel that your part is too small to matter but together huge change can happen. Get 'r' done! Comments Showing most recent comments first [Show in chronological order instead] |
Hot topics Connections to the world(7 ~ 8:55 AM, Jun 16)
Why rules?
Pandora's Box?
Are we spending wisely?
George Clooney Helps Brazil?
|
Originally the trimester was supposed to start this current school year but the compensation package for the teachers [some would be teaching an extra period]added work load could not be agreed upon.
that's my understanding at least. The teacher's union did agree to the trimester plan over the 7 period day plan but agreement could not be reached on the compensation portion. Hopefully this will be worked out in NEXT contract talks.
What ever happened to the trimester response of the teacher union and the board study committee?? Why isn't it being discussed any more? This was a good compromise !!
I heard from an administrator that trimesters are coming to the high schools in 2009-2010 (pending a new contract). If that is the case then the problem is solved. That would give them the oppurtunity to get 15 credits per semester if needed (if my math is correct). Have you not heard this Jenny?
As a student, I can say I concur greatly with so many of the statements made here. How frustrating to watch the schedule be stubbornly stuck at six periods a day! It's difficult to stomach watching peers struggle to find the credits to graduate, and it's worse watching teachers lose the elective classes they love to teach.
A college professor of mine made a very profound statement on the first day of class. He stated that "In high school, you were taught to pass a test, now we are going to teach you to think for yourselves." This statement was made in 2002, but it rings true today.
How well do I understand "the ones who never had to study for the other courses?" My son is one of them. He avoided taking AP classes, although the school recommended them, because he didn't want to put forth the effort. My ex-wife made the decision, not me. I feel he needed the push but was over-ruled.
That not withstanding,it is the taxpayer's responsibility under the Indiana Constitution to pay for a high school education for every student. It is not their responsibility to pay for college nor is it their responsibility to pay for classes which earn college credit. While you and I probably agree that a college education should be the right of any person who can earn one, the law doesn't yet lay the burden on the taxpayer, it is the responsibility of the individual.
That a student does not learn to study is a flaw not in the school but in the parents. Even if you know enough to pass the test, there is always something else to learn. It may not be in the textbook, but there is more knowledge available.
High schools cannot offer a "taste" of every course that the various colleges offer. It simply isn't financially feasible. How do you prepare a student for the rigors of pre-med or law school and still have money to help the students at risk of not even earning a high school diploma that qualifies them to work on the factory or warehouse floor? Both take money and there are too few dollars to do both.
As to switching majors in college, that, to me, shows a lack of research; again, the responsibility of the individual. Again, I see that coming with my son. His college is paid for through the bachelor's level by the VA due to my service-connected disability, however, he is currently considering chemical engineering or game design as careers. He is going to find out that the college courses required for either is going to entail some effort on his part and that, after high school is going to be a rude awakening for him..........lol. Such is life!
Our students will learn to compete in the job market, just as every generation before them has. Some will be successful and some will not. Whatever we do, we are not going to change that anymore than I could stop a college graduate from throwing a grenade into a grass hooch then flattening his body against the grass wall of it.
We just can't have our cake and eat it, too. If we could, I think that you and I would have frosting up to our elbows on our wishes that everyone get as much education as their brains would hold.
The AP courses offered rarely qualify as a replacement for college courses. Only when student scores 3 or above on the exam. What the more rigorous courses prepare the student to do however, is put the ones who never have to study for the other courses, into the study mode so that they are prepared to work for their grade in college. Many top students get into trouble when they don't have to study in HS, then have to learn how to once a freshman in college. It's not just the level of courses offered however but the varying subjects that allow the student to explore their interests for future careers. Many students switch majors multiple times while in college and it is sometimes financially overwhelming to take 5+ years to get a 4 year degree because of this. The variety of courses may also stimulate student's drive when they find a field that really interests them. If our schools don't offer both the variety and the varying levels of courses, our students will not have the opportunities that students do in other corporations, states, countries. If that is the case, ours will not be in the competition for the jobs. Choices made when in HS are very likely to affect choices all throughout life.
Jenny:
Agreed, we need the seven periods. One of the stumbling blocks is that a student can qualify to graduate without attending four years under current conditions. The school corporation does not wish, and really cannot afford, to lose money if the student qualifies and no longer wishes to attend; therefore reducing the student count funding is based upon. Raising the requirements for a diploma puts us right back to where we are now, some students need more time just to meet the minimum requirements and offering college-level courses for those who have qualified for a high school diploma burdens the taxpayer with paying for what is the individual's responsibility in the current higher education system.
Agreed, some students and/or their parents still haven't figured out "the more you learn, the more you earn!"
FlyinLion:
While I agree that MOST of those who WANT to attend Early bird classes, will do so, that still leaves those behind students whose parents don't realize how important and competitive education has become. We need to get ALL of the students involved in taking 7 periods a day in order to make them more prepared to compete for those jobs. Not just the ones who already realize this. Those students whose parents are still figuring that the school will take care of it all are the ones who will suffer for it in the future and will be at risk for being economically depressed throughout their working careers.
Sassypants - Which of Jenny's points do you question and why?
I have to agree with Jenny on this. Some students are hard pressed to qualify for a diploma after four years of high school in our system or could have taken a higher diploma given access to more classes.
As to Early Bird classes, those who want them bad enough will find transportation. I would rather that we went to seven periods, but only with just compensation for the teacher's added workload.
I do agree with you that if you sit back and complain you are not helping at all. You have to stand up for what you believe in.
Some of your other points I do question a bit.