[The Brazil Times nameplate] Fair ~ 90°F  
High: 88°F ~ Low: 60°F
Tuesday, Aug. 30, 2016


Posted Sunday, January 10, 2010, at 12:54 PM

Sailing has been a passion of mine since I was 3-years-old.

When the time comes for me to have an honest job (leave the practice of law), I would like to start a small manufacturing business here in Clay County making boats.

Every month, my favorite sailing magazine, Latitudes and Attitudes, gives a piracy report. For most of the last 10 years, Somalia has been featured regularly in those reports.

It has not made much news, but on Nov. 18, the Maersk Alabama was attacked again by Somali pirates. The Maersk Alabama is a cargo ship where the captain was taken hostage by Somali priates on its lifeboat. On Nov. 18, the pirates utterly failed in their attempt.

Surely, I cannot be the only person to have thought of potential solutions to the problem of modern day piracy.

The Law of the Sea permits any vessel in international waters to be armed. The Law of the Sea, until the mid-20th Century, permitted any vessel that captured pirates to try them by court martial, and if found guilty, the pirates could be summarily executed. When this provision was added to the Law of the Sea, it brought a fairly quick end to the "golden age of piracy." (The golden age of piracy is generally considered to be from approximately 1500 to approximately 1750).

Understandably, most ports today are quite unwilling to allow armed vessels to enter their harbor. Not many places want to iinvite groups of armed foreigners, mostly men, typically young, often single, onto their shores.

These days, virtually all freighters carry their cargo in steel freight containers designed to be trans-loaded onto trains and trucks. These freight containers are designed to stack and attach to each other. Typically, pictures of cargo ships show them with containers stacked well above the decks.

How hard would it be to skeletonize some of these containers, weld a large reinforced steel cylinder to the center, paint the whole thing safety orange, and mount an M2 Browning, .50 Cal machine gun inside the calendrical gun turret. These modified containers could be loaded on the four corners of the ship and manned by the ship's crew if they come under attack. As the ship nears port, these modified containers could be offloaded to a tending vessel and reloaded after leaving port. It should only take one or two attacks on ships with these bright orange corners before the pirates would decide to leave them alone.

To me, there seems to be little difference between stateless thugs who pray on innocents on the water and stateless thugs who pray on innocents on the land or in the air. Is there any reason to treat them in any way other than as pirates? Is there any reason why captured pirates, whether of the land, sea or air variety, should not be tried by court martial, and if found guilty, summarily executed?

Arming merchant ships and executing pirates in the late 1600s and early 1700s brought an end to the golden age of piracy. Isn't it probable that similar techniques could bring an end to the golden age of terrorism?

Showing comments in chronological order
[Show most recent comments first]

Mr. Hear....that makes way too much sense for the modern day "man" to comprehend. First we, meaning the government, then us because then they will have to raise our taxes again, have to pay an ungodly large amount of money to run all kinds of studies and comparisons. Then we shuck out another ungodly large amount of money to have said studies and comparisons analyzed and confirmed. Then we pay another extremely large amount of money to have a feasibility study run, then......you get the picture! So, after it's all said and done, we have public health care for everybody including the pirates because if they are ill then they can come here to live, have a right to health care and we will make them all better! Just a thought mixed in with some well placed sarcasm!

Yes, you are absolutely correct. Keep it simple and directly to the point...no pun intended on that one. I would vote for that! I would vote for you too if you ran for President. You have a great mind and you use it!

Have a good day Sir!

-- Posted by Proud of My Country on Wed, Jan 13, 2010, at 2:29 PM

I think u have a realistic view on all subjects,I would vote for you for any office!U the man with the plan!

-- Posted by westsidemom on Mon, Jan 18, 2010, at 10:37 PM

Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Hear me out
by Charles Hear
Recent posts
Blog RSS feed [Feed icon]
Comments RSS feed [Feed icon]
Hot topics
Round Two
(2 ~ 9:25 PM, Sep 22)

Donald Trump
(3 ~ 11:36 AM, Sep 7)

Hey Y'all, Watch This!
(2 ~ 11:30 AM, Sep 7)

What's Wrong With America
(2 ~ 11:29 AM, Sep 7)

The First Debate Is Over
(1 ~ 11:08 AM, Sep 1)