Guantanamo

Posted Monday, February 1, 2010, at 1:07 PM
Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Obama and his band of liberals always do the opposite of the right thing, so Guantanamo is not even a choice for them.Makes too much sense and would cost the least . As far as the terrorist "rights" are concerned the only right they could possibly deserve may be the right to pray true repentance and have a merciful God forgive them, they are murderers who deserve the fate they created for themselves.

    -- Posted by Ombudsman on Tue, Feb 2, 2010, at 8:30 AM
  • Thank you for your comment Ombudsman.

    Legally and morally, there is a huge difference between a soldier, a mercenary, and an enemy combatant. Enemy combatants are typically little different from organized criminals.

    Because we are a Christian nation and a Christian people, I hope these prisoners receive justice tempered with mercy. In many cases, that would mean capital punishment imposed with a minimum of suffering.

    CH

    -- Posted by Charles Hear on Wed, Feb 3, 2010, at 2:49 AM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: