[The Brazil Times nameplate] Fair ~ 77°F  
High: 88°F ~ Low: 68°F
Monday, Aug. 29, 2016

NASCAR race? What NASCAR race?

Posted Monday, July 28, 2008, at 3:53 PM

More than a few people, mostly those residing in Indiana, have argued that the Brickyard 400, has taken a spot alongside the Daytona 500 as NASCAR's 'crown jewel.' But after Sunday's debacle, Indianapolis has once again suffered a hit and continued to slip-slide down what is looking like an even more slippery slope.

Just three years removed from Formula One's own messy tire situation that left just six cars competing in the U.S. Grand Prix, this year's Brickyard event left drivers and perhaps most importantly, fans, leaving with a decidedly bad taste in their mouths.

While the 2005 Formula One race, in which all but six teams refused to compete due to safety concerns over tires, had global ramifications and at least partly led to the series departure from U.S. soil, Sunday's NASCAR race fell with a resounding thud amongst fans of arguably the nation's most popular sport.

NASCAR officials, worried about tire wear resulting from Indianapolis' diamond ground racing surface, placed a 12-lap lifespan on tires for Sunday's race. The result was that competition caution flags would fly intermittently to give teams a chance to replace tires that were wearing to the cords before drivers could event settle back into their HANS devices.

For fans, the result was frustrating and for many infuriating, after paying large sums of money to see, in effect, a group of 10-12 lap sprints to the pits. The race, and I use that term loosely, further fueled the debate that NASCAR racing at Indianapolis just isn't that good.

After attending 10 of the 15 races, and covering a handful of them for various publications, I'm even more convinced that the Brickyard event is long on spectacle and short on competition. For those NASCAR fans who get to see just the Brickyard 400 race each year, the entertainment value is still there if for no other reason than it's great to see your favorite drivers in person, even if they are barely up to speed like this year. But I'd be willing to say that more fun was had at O'Reilly Raceway Park this year for the Nationwide Series, Craftsman Truck Series and various USAC events.

Despite the resentment that stems from fans who paid hard earned money for the Brickyard, NASCAR did the right thing in not trading safety to appease the fan base. There was little the teams could do after not getting an opportunity to test the Car of Tomorrow on the track surface before this weekend. And the COT's debut at Indy was sorely lacking. But in the end, the most important thing is that no driver was seriously injured due to the track's effect on tires.

Certainly fingers, perhaps even middle ones, will be pointed at Goodyear, who has long known that Indy's surface has a unique effect on tires. Yet they still didn't do any tire testing with the new cars in preparation for this weekend. There is no secret here since the track was last resurfaced in 2004.

Goodyear brought three cars here in April for a tire test, but as any Indiana resident can tell you, April weather is decidedly different than the hot and humid summers that leave Hoosiers basking in pools and Central Air.

"Nobody likes to race like this," said Greg Stucker, Goodyear's director of race tire sales. "I think the teams are going to be upset, probably rightly so."

So again, a black eye is laid upon Indianapolis and Hoosier NASCAR fans are left wanting. And at Indianapolis Motor Speedway, where the Greatest Spectacle in Racing is run during the Indy 500, fans were left with just a sad spectacle.

Showing most recent comments first
[Show in chronological order instead]

I went to the so called "race". Call it anything you want but don't call it a race. I was robbed and NASCAR should refund ticket prices,

-- Posted by Ventuno on Tue, Aug 5, 2008, at 3:00 PM

as a nasar fan ,,, i went and didnt not like the race ,,, but one question. why didnt nacar go back to the old tires ?

-- Posted by pitza on Mon, Aug 4, 2008, at 8:10 AM

That was Goodyears fault if anyone. Nothing has changed about the track from last year or the year prior. The only variable here is the type of car and the tire.

That was the most boring race I ever had the misfortune to listen too and as a hoosier i'm livid over that tire situation.

-- Posted by Inquizitor on Sun, Aug 3, 2008, at 2:16 PM

Why does Indianapolis get a "black eye" in this? This is the same track that has always been there from day one...a rectangle with four rounded corners...and the same surface that NASCAR has raced on for two (or is it three?) races prior to this one.

No, the track does not lend itself to the side-by-side racing that most tracks that NASCAR goes to allows. But doesn't that call upon more of driver's actual skill rather than just the raw speed of the car itself?

This race was unfortunate and I feel sorry for the fans who paid high ticket prices and spent long times in traffic burning almost $4/gallon gasoline, but to lay this at the door of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, or saying it gets a "black eye" because of it, just isn't fair and borders on irresponsibe reporting. We can debate how much of the blame lies with NASCAR, Goodyear, or the crew chiefs themselves, but IMS has no dog in this fight!

-- Posted by ClayCountyGuy on Tue, Jul 29, 2008, at 6:50 AM

Goodyear is required by Nascar to bring a soft

tire to creat better racing!!!! Goodyear has

harder tires that Nascar does not want to use.

-- Posted by tbrackman1 on Mon, Jul 28, 2008, at 5:49 PM

Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration:

On the Fast Track
Carey Fox
Recent posts
Blog RSS feed [Feed icon]
Comments RSS feed [Feed icon]