|
|
Overcast ~ High: 38°F Friday, Feb. 10, 2012 |
|
Property tax caps not a good ideaPosted Sunday, March 8, 2009, at 4:54 PM
Editor's Note:Given the topic of my column this week, I've decide to also post it as my blog to allow readers the right and ability to comment on my opinions and provide their own. I understand the "small man" may not have the chance to have their voice heard in the statehouse, but it does not mean they do not have a voice.
The state is taking us for fools. In the past few years major changes have been made which many legislators have said would "make the lives of Indiana residents better." At first glance, the property tax caps appeared to be a stroke of genius. However, it could eventually destroy county and city governments. Locally, the budget shortfalls are expected to be minimal this year, but when the caps drop to 1 percent for homeowners next year, it could be the beginning of a catastrophe. The shortfall is anticipated to be more than $100,000 for the city and even more on the county level. Remember, this is the state's doing. Current lack of funds to repair roads, school buildings and water systems will be magnified exponentially as officials will have to make the ultimate decision; whether to cut services desperately needed or to cut the staffing who work to provide the services. It's the ultimate lose-lose situation. On top of that, take into consideration that after a couple of months of reviews, amendments and rejections, House Bill 1001 was approved in the final hours of the legislative session last year. Since then, I have had a few legislators tell me there would need to be a lot of work done to fix some of the mistakes and problems with the bill. Now why would they pass something knowing there was problems with it? Some may argue because it was an election year, but you may have your own thoughts. The biggest eye opener I discovered about the property tax caps is they are a violation of the Indiana State Constitution, which is most likely why the state wants to introduce it as a referendum to modify the constitution. Now, moving on to this year, things aren't any more pleasing. The state is proposing various bills which would eliminate the county commissioners and hire a single county executive, who would appoint various county positions, therefore, taking some of the voting power away from Indiana residents. Mind you, these bills exclude Marion County -- and Lake County in some -- from being affected. To be sarcastic for a moment ... isn't Democracy great right now? Governor Mitch Daniels has claimed the employment in Indiana has grown in recent years, yet he has backed ideas which have eliminated township assessors and threatens to eliminate the jobs of commissioners around the state. I don't get it. It's almost as if he is speaking to us while holding a puppet at his side to distract us. Yet somehow, it is working. It's amazing how the bigwigs at the statehouse sit back and make these major decisions without consulting the smaller areas which would be affected the most. The property tax caps came about after a few of the larger counties basically had issues with their internal systems and residents had huge tax bills. They complained, the state listened and here we are, facing less services or less employment in Clay County because of it. Plus, with the potential of a single county executive appointing people to vital positions, the door could be blown off the hinges, allowing the possibility of massive nepotism, incompetence or worse, a lack of knowledge on how to efficiently do the job. As a reporter, I am supposed to be unbiased and state the facts. But when off the clock, I am a resident, taxpayer and a person who is seeing vital needs and rights slowly being taken away from all of us. It is frustrating for residents to find their letters and phone calls to legislators wanting explanations or asking for change see their opinions largely ignored. It is the same on this end when trying to gain knowledge, do research and get credible information from sources at the state when there is no response to my calls or e-mails either. I'd be lying if I claimed to know what could be done to change things, but residents of smaller communities like ours cannot give up. To me, those supporting taking away voting rights and almost blindly passing legislation knowing all to well that it is wrong better go change the baby because something stinks. Former President Theodore Roosevelt once said, "Speak softly and carry a big stick." As a small community, Clay County is stuck with a soft voice as far as the statehouse is concerned, but no one said we can't find a big stick and swing it so they will take notice. Comments Showing most recent comments first [Show in chronological order instead] |
Hot topics Big men moving on(2 ~ 3:31 PM, Jul 20)
Much more fun to come
Just get them back on the field
Just another foot in the mouth
Starting from scratch for a greater cause
|
With the tax caps and the shortfalls faced by local government entities, you may well have trouble getting through the intersection of Forest and National Avenues here in Brazil.
Any day now, I expect to see the County Commissioners, the County Council, representatives from the City of Brazil, the Clay Community Schools Corporation, the Brazil Public Library standing there along with the usual charities and fund-raisers for the schools.It is one of the few methods available to augment the shortfalls caused by the tax caps.
I so agree with you on the property tax issue. With the state of our county needing MORE money to help support its infrastructure, I was personally shocked to receive a tax bill last year that was almost 30% lower than year before. My thought at the time was how will the county have enough money when fewer funds were collected when they didn't have enough BEFORE the cut?
If you add to the cap they propose they fact that the economic problems, especially the mortgage crisis has LOWERED the value of many homes due to having so many on the market and fewer in the position to buy them right now, the property taxes which are linked to the MARKET VALUE of the property is likely to further reduce amounts collected in the near future as well stabbing the local communities with a sort of double edged sword.
As far as the local government issues. There is some merit to the study recently done with regard to township trustees in my opinion. In many states local government works well with only county and individual city levels. The township trustees in many cases become redundant or cover so little extra that could be absorbed by those other entities. In my personal experience here in Clay County, I have found trustee performance to be arbitrary at the very most depending upon how well you were "connected". In some cases it has been non existent and all the voter could do is continue to pay the person until they could be voted out of office. The duties too few to not to be able to be absorbed by other positions as well as too non essential to most citizens to cause any meaningful outrage and action to correct any non performance.
So yes local government needs some reform but it is not totally broken to require abolishing it altogether. Some middle ground needs to be reached, maybe from studying models in other states that work more efficiently?