|
|
|
|
Light Rain ~ High: 69°F ~ Low: 51°F Saturday, May 25, 2013 |
|
Some classics are better left alonePosted Monday, July 13, 2009, at 9:27 AM
A report came across The Brazil Times' wire service Monday morning that really disturbed me.
Apparently, there is a remake in the works of "The Karate Kid." The original, released in 1984, starred Ralph Macchio as Daniel Larusso. He and his mother move from one coast to the other to basically start over. But things don't go so well for young Daniel, who is picked on by school bullies. Mr. Kesuke Miyagi (played by Pat Morita) takes Daniel under his wing and begins to teach him the art of Karate. Most of you probably know the rest. But if you don't, I don't want to spoil it. If you get a chance, rent the flick and watch it. It's entertaining. Monday morning, I saw a story come across about this apparent remake of this movie. According to the story, Jackie Chan will play a kung-fu master in a "Hollywood-Chinese" remake of the "The Karate Kid." Chan's disciple in the movie will be played by Jaden Smith, son of Hollywood stars Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith. Upon seeing this news, my mind started wondering. I couldn't help but think, why does Hollywood continue to make remakes of movies? Have all original ideas gone out the window? What are the worst remakes of all time? Ah-Ha! Another list opportunity! I then started thinking about what I believed to be the worst remakes of all time. It's actually not that difficult when you think about it. So many films have been remade over the years, but I thought I would focus on what I believe to be the 10 worst remakes in Hollywood history. Here's my list: 10. Superman Returns -- The only thing that didn't push this further down the list was the fact that Kevin Spacey played Lex Luthor. The movie was remade in 2006. 9. The Thomas Crown Affair -- Remade in 1999 and starring Pierce Brosnan, this film didn't live up to the hype from the first one, which starred Steve McQueen. 8. King Kong -- This film has been remade several times, most recently in 2005, which didn't really generate a new fan base. The film was also remade in 1976, and that adaptation is often considered bad as well, although I kind of liked it. In other words, my taste in movies isn't all that great, apparently. 7. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre -- Remade in 2003, it just didn't pack enough of a punch like the first movie did, which was released in 1974. 6. Planet of the Apes -- Remade in 2001 and starring Mark Wahlberg, this film probably shouldn't have been remade at all. 5. Psycho -- Remade in 1998 and starring Vince Vaughn among others, how dare Hollywood mess with an Alfred Hitchcock classic? 4. Godzilla -- Remade in 1998, the film starred Matthew Broderick, among others. A train wreck. 3. House of Wax -- Remade in 2005, this "gem" starred Paris Hilton, among others. Good grief, Vincent Price was in the original, which came out in 1953. 2. The Omen -- Remade in 2006, the original made people squeamish, but for much different reasons than the remake. 1. Can't Buy Me Love -- Remade in 2003, under the title "Love Don't Cost a Thing." Why, oh why, oh why, Hollywood. Why? I'm quite certain my list will chance in 2010 after the release of "The Kung-Fu Kid." Let alone a 2010 remake of "Footloose," which a co-worker reminded me a remake is already in the works for this 80s classic as well. What's next, "The Breakfast Club?" They could call it, "The After School Club." What about "St. Elmo's Fire?" The remake could be called "Where we hung out while in college, but life has changed and it may be time to grow up but we can't because we ..." "Meatballs?" They could call it, "That summer when we went to camp and met the really cool guy who made us laugh because he was just plain silly." Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Hot topics Keeping everything in perspective(0 ~ 11:52 AM, May 23)
Who are these guys?
Sorry, Nancy, I don't feel for you
Yep. It's official. I'm old.
Say 'I Love You' everyday
|
You are so right. Remaking movies that are still sold,watched, and loved after all these years are just regurgitations of the originals. If it's a film you watched when younger and can still enjoy watching with your kids now, why try to improve it? Karate Kid and Footloose and even Dirty Dancing tell timeless stories and teach valuable lessons. They don't need to be updated. The audience is intelligent enough to extrapolate the time period differences.
Jason,
I agree. It does appear that Hollywood has lost that original spark and is looking at old movies and re-working them. The classics are best left untouched. What's next on the "let's make a new movie out of an old one" craze, Space Ghost? Police Academy? Blazing Saddles? Caddyshack? Where does it stop?
I totally agree with you Jason and that train wreck Tom Cruise remake of War of the Worlds just made me nauseous. Great blog!
Nothing comes close to the number of remakes of Akira Kurosawa's "The Seven Samurai." The setting is different each time, but the essential elements remain. Some of these remakes like "The Magnificent Seven" and "A Bug's Life" are quite good in their own right. Others like "The A-Team" are at best guilty pleasures.
How about a list of movies that the remake is deemed better than the original?
I'm thinking that the new James Bond "Casino Royale" is as good, if not better, than the original. Of course, much of that is due to using technology that is more up to date, both on the screen and in producing the film.
From Jason's list, there are only two of the originals that he mentioned that I would consider watching the originals again, let alone watching a re-make.
I think that Hollywood is "grabbing at straws" when a classic is re-made. However, there are many more "flops" that could be re-made into classics.