[The Brazil Times nameplate] Partly Cloudy ~ 59°F  
High: 58°F ~ Low: 45°F
Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Several topics discussed at event

Sunday, February 22, 2009

State Senators and Representatives met with local citizens to discuss state and county issues at the recent Cracker Barrel, Saturday, which took place at the Jackson Township Volunteer Fire House.

The two-hour meeting kicked off with a discussion about the economic pinch the state is currently in. The drastic financial situation has left the state a whopping $142 million behind its estimated goal, which has led to major changes being implemented in the state budget.

Instead of implementing a two-year budget, which is what has been done in past sessions, Indiana has switched to a one-year plan.

Clyde Kersey, Representative from District 43, said this was being done because it is difficult to know where money will be most needed down the line due to the current state of the economy.

"This is a difficult situation," Kersey said. "The economy is going downhill and we don't know where we're going to be in two years."

One major focus of the state is job creation. Unemployment rose from 7.1 percent statewide in December to 8.2 percent in January.

Vern Tincher, Representative of District 46, said this was a bad situation that was only going to get worse if drastic action wasn't taken.

The representatives discussed the passing of House Bill 1656, a job creation bill, which would take $500 million from the "Major Moves Trust Fund," a funding system for highway repair. By doing this, they were hoping to create more jobs. The road funds would then be replaced when the state receives its cut from President Obama's recently passed stimulus package.

By rule, the funding taken from "Major Moves" can only be used on jobs related to road repair. Tincher also said the goal was to make so that no less than 90 percent of the jobs created by this action would go to Indiana residents, saying "if we're spending Hoosier dollars, we should be hiring Hoosier workers."

There was also discussion about delaying upcoming property tax cuts. Under the current "caps" system, which dictates what percentage property tax is paid by homeowners, farmers, businesses and homeowners.

Homeowners pay 1.5 percent, farmers pay 2.5 percent and businesses pay 3.5 percent under the current system.

These percentages were set to drop to 1, 2 and 3 percent respectively by 2010. While property tax decrease is usually greeted fondly by citizens, Kersey felt it would be in the best interest of the state to push these tax breaks back.

Kersey's reasoning was that a decrease in property taxes could lead to the dissolution of public services. This was already seen in Terre Haute recently, as three library branches were shut down. Kersey argued that a tax break at this time could lead to further losses and cuts of public service, which could reach as far as the fire and police departments.

Lastly, there was a fairly fiery discussion about the Kernan-Shepard report, which would call for a complete reorganization of local government.

According to Kersey, if passed, the bill would allow for one elected official to appoint various other governmental positions such as sheriff, auditor, and town clerk, rather than having all these positions filled via election. Kersey said if this bill were to pass, it would be a "hit for Democracy."

Also speaking out in a passionate dismissal of Kernan-Shepard was Clay County Commissioner Paul Sinders.

Sinders strongest objection with the bill was that it was being passed by big city politicians, working out of cities such as Indianapolis, South Bend, Fort Wayne and Bloomington.

Sinders took exception to big city officials trying to dictate the ways of rural Indiana, even though they had no first-hand knowledge of how government was run in these areas. The commissioner warned against the passing of the bill, saying the people who wanted it implemented didn't have the interest of small town citizens in mind.

"I caution people in Clay County to watch this," Sinders said. "We are a rural state being run by the big city."

Kersey reemphasized his adamant opposing of the bill, saying that it is not only misguided, but that due to the quality of work of local government, it wasn't needed.

"Before the recession, Indiana was fifth in the nation at job creation," Kersey said. "Why reorganize when making changes could be more costly in the long run?"

The next Cracker Barrel is scheduled for Saturday, March 21. No location has been set yet.

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on thebraziltimes.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Farmers pay 2.5% of a set market price per acre which about 25% of the actual market value. Don't be fooled by information provided by Indiana Farm Bureau.

-- Posted by ucantbserious on Mon, Feb 23, 2009, at 8:43 AM

There was a huge farm land sale in Montgomery county IL a month or so ago. Several thousand acres and it was land that was going to remain farmland. Not a small plot to be sold for development.

Average price per acre was WELL over $5,000 per acre. Is the land valued at true true market value yet? I know they are trying to bring residential property up to standards of fair market value but not sure they are there yet with farm land. What is can sell for is what we are talking about.

As far as local government goes in Indiana, I would suggest looking at other states as examples. How is it that so many others function just fine without township trustees and we can't? We need to save money someplace. Cutbacks are being made in every company and every family. Local government needs to make these cuts as well so the money can be spent on projects that are underfunded.

-- Posted by Jenny Moore on Tue, Feb 24, 2009, at 6:04 AM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: