The waiting game continues for everyone affected by the double homicide of Tonya Pickett, 16, and her stepfather Ricky Mustard, 32, on Nov. 20, 1988.
Although arrested in March 2008, John Lovett, Brazil, still doesn't know when his court date will be as officials wait for a ruling on the admissibility of potential evidence.
"We're basically in a holding pattern right now," Lovett's defense attorney Dorie Hertzel recently told The Brazil Times about the delay in the case.
As court proceedings linger on, many have wondered what has happened not only since the double homicide, but also since Lovett's arrest.
Information used to create the timeline at the bottom of this article was taken from the archives of The Brazil Times, along with information provided over time through other media outlets, Indiana State Police and court documents available at the Clay County Courthouse.
Information used to create this timeline was taken from the archives of The Brazil Times, along with information provided over time through other media outlets, Indiana State Police and court documents available at the Clay County Courthouse.
November 18, 1988
It was raining when Cheryl Mustard left for work in Greencastle, leaving her husband Ricky, 32, home alone at 110 W. Pinckley St., Brazil. The family had moved into the home located near the intersection of Pinckley and Franklin streets approximately one month prior.
Ricky, a former Marine, was at home recovering from paralyzing injuries caused by a motorcycle accident in July 1988.
His stepdaughter Tonya Pickett, 16, and her boyfriend John Lovett, 18, attended a basketball game and dance at Northview High School.
8:30 p.m.: Shane Mustard, 13 at the time, calls his father to arrange a meeting for the following weekend.
10-10:30 p.m.: Pickett and Lovett go to McDonald's with friends.
11:15-11:30 p.m.: Lovett takes Pickett home.
11:30-11:40 p.m.: Lovett phones Pickett; it is the last known contact with the victims.
November 19, 1988
1:15-1:30 a.m.: Cheryl Pickett arrived home to discover her husband and daughter shot to death. Although a weapon was never found, a 3-inch Magnum 12-gauge shotgun casing was found at the crime scene. Information is released that each victim was shot in the face. Officials believe the murders took place sometime after midnight.
1:30 a.m.: Members of the Brazil City Police, Clay County Sheriff's Department and Indiana State Police (including BCPD Capt. Roger Lindsay) arrive on scene to begin investigating the double homicide. The initial investigation centers on Mustard as the prime target by the murder suspect(s), with Pickett being murdered because she was home. An anonymous tip then leads investigators to believe drugs may be involved in the murder.
8 a.m.: Lovett calls Ricky Mustard's family, informing them about murders.
Later that morning, local residents use metal detectors to help canvas area during the rain for potential clues and evidence in the case.
November 19-20, 1988
Witnesses come forward, reporting they heard a loud car circling the neighborhood several times the night of the murder and muffled gunshots sometime shortly before midnight.
During interviews with the media, Clay County Prosecutor Fritz D. Modesitt reports the murders were done "execution style," while Indiana State Police Det. Sgt. Don Collins releases information that entry was probably gained through the front door of the victims' home.
November 21, 1988
Michael Clark, of the Indiana University Medical Center, performs autopsies on both victims. Officials said final results would take several weeks.
November 22, 1988
Clark announces preliminary autopsy results, saying that both Pickett and Mustard died from gunshot wounds to the head, with the suspect using one deer slug per victim to shoot both through their right eyes.
Officials announce there will be a "media blackout" on further details surrounding the crime.
During interviews with Pickett's Northview High School classmates and teachers, it is disclosed that she told her friends her greatest fear was "coming home and finding her mother and stepfather dead."
November 23, 1988
Family and friends attend the double funeral ceremony for Pickett and Mustard.
Mayor Norval Pickett, Tonya's father's great-uncle, tells the media the double-homicide is like a "jigsaw puzzle" while announcing a reward has been set up in the case. Businesses and local citizens donated "unsolicited funds" totaling more than $2,000 for a reward to be issued to the person who provides information leading to the arrest and conviction of the suspect(s) involved in the crime.
February 23, 1989
Brazil City Police Chief Billy Love announces the reward has risen to $6,000. People with information are urged to contact Love or Capt. Roger Lindsay at the department.
March 30, 1989
ISP Chief of Detectives Sgt. Jerry Statler announces officials have a suspect in mind and have located a potential weapon in the double homicide case, which is undergoing testing at an undisclosed lab facility. Statler said the suspect was living in the Brazil area, but declined further information about the case.
April 3, 1989
Mustard's mother Helen Lanham tells The Brazil Times she believes her son was "run off the road" during a motorcycle accident around 2:52 a.m., July 23, 1988. Not wearing a helmet when found by city police officers, Mustard was approximately 25-feet from his motorcycle on North Depot St. Apparently, Mustard left the road for "some unknown reason" and hit a utility pole.
Lanham said her son could barely raise his right arm and was in the process of learning how to do everything with his left arm. She couldn't believe he would be involved in drugs because it was too expensive.
She was frustrated with the investigation, especially because officials did not notify her first when her son died, and the rumors surrounding the double homicide.
It was announced during the interview that Cheryl Pickett had moved to the Chicago area.
Lindsay leaves the Brazil City Police Department and moves away from Clay County.
Active leads in the Pickett/Mustard murder dwindle, which is why it becomes a cold case.
According to information provided by Pickett family members in prior interviews, the television show "Unsolved Mysteries" was contacted about profiling the double homicide. However, when producers of the program contacted local authorities, presiding Mayor Norval Pickett Jr. and officials at the Brazil City Police Department refused access. The family was told the denial was because it might conflict with the ongoing investigation.
Leaving Indiana, Lindsay moves to Florida.
Cheryl Pickett contacts the Indiana State Police Cold Case Homicide Investigative Unit about becoming involved.
Officials of the Indiana State Police Cold Case Unit begin investigation into case.
July 28-29, 2003
Former Police Captain Roger Lindsay is requested and voluntarily returns to Indiana to assist an official review of evidence in the case. Lindsay is employed as a federal police officer with the Florida Department of Veterans Affairs.
July 2003--November 2004
Three witnesses come forward to allegedly recant prior "false" statements to cold case detectives. A fourth individual informs cold case detectives of alleged additional threats and intimidation by Lindsay. Although not a suspect in the investigation, the cold case team shifts its focus to Lindsay's alleged misconduct during the initial investigation, including perjury, obstruction of justice and intimidation.
January 9, 2004
Indiana State Police officials hold a press conference to request public input in the renewed investigation into a new direction in the case. Anyone who might have spoken to Tonya Pickett the night of the murder or seen a small light colored car near the scene of the crime, with special attention to the time frame of 10 p.m.-1 a.m., was requested to contact officials. Officials reported a new suspect has come to the attention to investigators, but no information was made available.
October 28, 2004
Officials involved in the case announce more than 100 witnesses have been interviewed during the ongoing cold case investigation.
Lindsay is requested and again returns voluntarily to help investigators review evidence in the case. During an interview, officers serve Lindsay with a subpoena for him to appear at Grand Jury proceedings, of which he will be a "target."
December 7, 2004
Grand Jury convenes in the Pickett/Mustard case.
December 9, 2004
After filing a motion to quash the subpoena, Judge Ernest Yelton approves the motion and Lindsay (in Florida) does not appear to testify.
After three days of deliberation, the Grand Jury announces there was enough evidence to indict Lindsay. He was charged with one Class C count of corrupt business influence (RICO-racketeering) and two counts of Class A misdemeanor charges of false informing. Lindsay is arrested at his home in Florida.
December 17, 2004
Lindsay is extradited back to Indiana, taken into custody by Indiana State Police officials and transported to the Clay County Jail.
December 20, 2004
Formally arraigned in Clay Circuit Court, Lindsay pleads not guilty and posts a $10,000 cash bond. He returns to his home in Florida.
Lindsay's defense attorney Scott E. Racop issues a press release stating that his client does not understand why he is being charged in the matter and believes the charges are without merit. Cooperating fully with the cold case investigation, Lindsay believes the charges are in retaliation for his filing a civil suit against the Indiana State Police, which was later dropped.
November 4, 2005
Lindsay and attorney Racop file a motion to dismiss the charges, citing they did not survive the statute of limitation for the Class C felony charge of racketeering.
December 2, 2005
During a hearing on the matter of the racketeering, the court dismisses the racketeering charge against Lindsay.
December 13, 2005
Special Judge Matthew Headley issues response to Lindsay's motion to dismiss the charges. Headley finds that the state can continue its case against Lindsay for the two false informing charges, but not continue with the corrupt business influence (RICO-racketeering) charge.
March 9, 2007
The State of Indiana files a motion in the Court of Appeals regarding the dismissal of Lindsay's charge. Deputy Attorney General Cynthia L. Ploughe said the state's cause for why the court should overturn the dismissal, while Lindsay's attorney did not cross-file a motion in the case. In a case opinion released by the court, the pattern of Lindsay's alleged misconduct did not meet the requirement of the statute of limitations, which expired in 2001. Lindsay's alleged offenses in 2003 and 2004 do not constitute RICO charges, and upheld the lower courts dismissal of the untimely filing of the charge in late 2004.
January 30, 2008
Special Prosecuting Attorney David N. Powell requests the Clay Circuit Court to call into session a Grand Jury. The Clerk of the Court issues a venire for people to appear for Grand Jury service in the matter of the Pickett/Mustard murder case. Thirty people were contacted to appear on Feb. 20.
February 4, 2008
Information is released about a potential second Grand Jury convening to hear evidence in the Pickett/Mustard case.
February 7, 2008
Officials hold a press conference confirming a Grand Jury will convene in the case. Eight jurors are to be seated by Circuit Court judge Joe Trout on Feb. 20, with the jury scheduled to begin reviewing evidence and hearing testimony from 230 potential witnesses at the Clay County Justice Center on Feb. 25.
March 8, 2008
Officials met with various family members and media outlets at the Clay County Justice Center to announce an arrest had been made in a 20-year-old Clay County cold case. Pickett's boyfriend at the time of her murder, Brazil resident John Lovett, 37, was taken into custody and formally arraigned in Clay Circuit Court on two counts of murder. Lovett was tentatively scheduled to appear for a jury trial at 9 a.m., Aug. 4, 2008.
After his family raised and paid the 10 percent of the $200,000 cash bond April 16, 2008, Lovett voluntarily turned himself in to authorities May 12, 2008. Clay Circuit Court Judge Joseph Trout rescinded the bond after extensive research discovered an error in the court proceedings. Trout said he felt it was important to correct the situation to protect the integrity of the court proceedings. An evidentiary hearing, which allows a defendant to present evidence and challenge the case against them, was supposed to take place in order for bail to be set, but it did not.
The court ordered Lovett remains in custody until the evidentiary hearing could take place.
On June 5, Lovett's defense counsel requested a change of venue from Clay County. claiming the case was a source of great controversy, rumor, gossip and innuendo in the community. Four days later, the prosecution indicated to the court they did not object to the trial jury being selected from another county.
On Aug. 12, 2008, Lovett's defense attorney Richard Kammen presented the testimony of several witnesses in court in an attempt to the show that the Grand Jury was presented potentially one-sided testimony during the February proceedings. Special Prosecuting Attorney David N. Powell said it was an unusual and rarely used court proceeding.
Focusing on which victim was shot first, the position of Pickett's body and whether it was moved after her death, Kammen questioned the autopsy reports, crime scene photos and interpretation of that evidence.
At conclusion of the court proceedings, Trout said the attorneys had agreed to present submissions to the court of highlighted rebuttal testimony from the more than 3,000 pages in order to speed up the bond process.
Judge Joseph Trout heard final oral arguments from the defense and prosecuting attorneys in the evidentiary portion of the bond reduction hearing Oct. 17.
Although Trout previously reviewed a large amount of Grand Jury testimony at the request of the prosecution and defense attorneys from Lovett's previous court appearance in August, they requested he review more testimony before making a decision that could potentially set a legal precedent in Indiana.
Trout told the court at the end of the proceedings a written decision as whether he will grant or deny Lovett's request for bond would come within a few days.
On Oct. 21, Trout ordered Love was eligible for bail and the jury trial proceedings would be handled in another venue.
According to the order, the lengthy evidentiary review process indicated the state's circumstantially based evidence in the case was not sufficient enough to prevent Lovett from receiving bail. However, the bail, which was set at $200,000 with 10 percent allowed, was made a cash bond with no 10 percent allowed. To ensure the case is judged by fair and impartial proceedings, Trout agreed the case should be venued out of Clay County.
On Dec. 17, Lovett was released after his family paid the whole $200,000 cash bond to await further court proceedings in the matter. The case, which is tentatively scheduled for a jury trial on Feb. 23, 2009, is venued to Hendricks County Superior Court Division 1.
Due to legal filings by both the prosecution and the defense regarding admissibility/certification of "certain evidence," the jury trial is put on hold.
With new legal filings in the case nearly every month, on Aug. 7, the case grinds to a halt while Hendricks County Superior Court Judge Robert Freese decides what would be considered admissible during the upcoming jury trial. At the center of the debate were letters the state wishes to use as evidence written by Lovett and Pickett from 1986-88.
On Aug. 26, Freese rules the letters are not admissible as evidence due to Indiana rules of evidence and their being irrelevant to the case because they were not "dated."
Freese granted the state's request for an appeal on the decision with the Indiana Court of Appeals.
Both the state and the defense complete their portions of briefing the court of appeals on their positions regarding the admissibility/certification of letters into evidence.
On Feb. 18, the Indiana Court of Appeals issued its response/opinion, upholding Freese's previous ruling and siding with the defense that the letters would not be admissible.
Officials recently confirmed to The Brazil Times the state is able to "transfer" the case to the Indiana Supreme Court for another opinion/appeal the ruling. However, the state has yet to make a filing in the matter.
If the Indiana Supreme Court accepts the transfer, the proceedings will wait for the ruling.
If the Indiana Supreme Court declines the transfer, the case will be set for a jury trial.