[The Brazil Times nameplate] Fair ~ 50°F  
High: 67°F ~ Low: 50°F
Friday, Apr. 29, 2016

ACLU: Teaching creationism is unconstitutional

Thursday, January 26, 2012

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana's top lawyer said Thursday that a bill pending that would allow schools to teach creationism in science classes clearly violates the U.S. Constitution and invites legal challenges.

U.S. Supreme Court precedents "going back many years" have established the unconstitutionality of teaching creationism in public schools, Ken Falk said.

"The idea that somehow our state legislature can trump the Constitution just doesn't make sense," Falk said in a news release issued by the ACLU. "When lawmakers propose legislation they clearly know will end up in the courts, it wastes valuable time and resources, disrespects the legislative process and confuses an already complicated issue."

The Senate Education Committee voted 8-2 Wednesday to send the bill before the full Senate despite experts and even some senators saying teaching creationism likely would be ruled unconstitutional if challenged in court. The bill's prospects for advancing to the House weren't certain Thursday. Next Wednesday is the deadline for bills originating in the Senate to win approval from the full chamber.

Falk said the U.S. Supreme Court in its 1987 case Edwards v. Aguillard struck down a Louisiana statute that required instruction on evolution to be accompanied by teaching on "creation science." The court found that the Louisiana statute had no identifiable secular purpose, but that the "pre-eminent purpose of the Louisiana Legislature was clearly to advance the religious viewpoint that a supernatural being created humankind."

In committee debate Wednesday, Sen. Scott Schneider, R-Indianapolis, said there are legitimate questions about the theory of evolution and that many scientists agree with the concept of intelligent design, the theory that life on Earth is so complex it was guided by an intelligent higher power.

"What are we afraid of? Allowing an option for students including creation science as opposed to limiting their exposure?" Schneider said.

Senate Education Chairman Dennis Kruse, R-Auburn, said he knew of nothing in state law that prohibits public schools from teaching creationism. He said he sponsored the bill because he believes creationism should be taught among the theories on the development of life and that the proposal wouldn't force any changes in schools teaching evolution.

Some committee members suggested that they would support amending the bill in the full Senate to instead encourage schools to teach about the world's religions in literature or history classes. Sen. Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, voted in favor of the bill even though it called its current form a "lawyer's dream."


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on thebraziltimes.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

I agree I believe this issue would be unconstitutional. So why do our political bullys push this? It clearly states this in the US Constitution. Or did we leave the union while I was away??

-- Posted by Combat VET on Thu, Jan 26, 2012, at 9:18 PM

@ Roger, What does it clearly state in the constitution?

-- Posted by Shadrach on Thu, Jan 26, 2012, at 11:06 PM

The origin of life on Earth is a matter of speculation on the part of Mankind. The theory of evolution explains the diversity of life, but it doesn't explain the origin of life; just as the "Big Bang" theory can explain the origin of this universe but doesn't explain why whatever was before suddenly, and for no apparent reason, transformed into the known universe. As there were no known eyewitnesses, the origin of life and the universe is a guess on our part and one guess is as good as any other.

Science is the seeking of knowledge, not the elimination of theory by arbitrary means. Given the recent work and continuing research in life sciences, in the future Mankind may well stumble upon a viable combination of conditions and materials and produce a new form of life in the laboratory, probably by accident. For all we know, our universe may well be to something far larger and superior to Man as sub-atomic particles are to us.

Nowhere in the Constitution is thinking outlawed, on any subject.

-- Posted by Leo L. Southworth on Fri, Jan 27, 2012, at 11:57 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: